They get a better recent performer for a Cup push and clear Jarry’s 2027-28 year, but paying a prospect and taking on a higher AAV for only a one‑year upgrade is a marginal bet; they probably ask for a sweetener or some retention.
.
Who says no?
13 votesReaders say DET. The model says EDM.
Assets
- Gibson, John$6,400,000
- Jarry, Tristan$5,375,000
- Howard, Isaac$950,000
Who says no?
A bubble team not all‑in on 2026-27 gains an extra year of a starting goalie plus a young, cheap winger, which fits a soft rebuild, but they are giving up the better current goalie and some cap flexibility, so they’d want to be convinced Jarry rebounds.
The deal
Edmonton Oilers acquire John Gibson from the Detroit Red Wings; Detroit Red Wings acquire Tristan Jarry and Isaac Howard from the Edmonton Oilers.
Team by team
Edmonton swaps Jarry’s extra year at $5.375M for Gibson’s expiring $6.4M UFA deal to chase a short‑term upgrade in net for their Cup window, accepting a modest cap increase this year but gaining future flexibility with no term beyond this season.
Detroit moves an older pending UFA goalie for a slightly cheaper starter with one extra year of control plus a 22‑year‑old, waiver‑exempt winger on an ELC, aligning better with a bubble/retool timeline and adding a young cost‑controlled skater at the cost of giving up the better current goalie.
Analysis
Value is close but tilted toward Detroit given Gibson’s stronger recent performance and expiring flexibility, so Edmonton would likely push for a pick or retention, while Detroit would be tempted by the extra year of Jarry plus Howard in a retooling context. As constructed it’s plausible but a bit optimistic from Edmonton’s side that Detroit parts with Gibson straight up for this package.
Discussion1
Edmonton needs forward scoring depth. Can't give up Howard for nothing. Also Gibson has had the chance to go to Edmonton and he shut it down with his NMC