All proposalsDET / CHI

Would he go to hawks

cw_user_kwqqoczzOct 13, 2026
27%
chance it happens

Model says DET says no.

Vote below to see if readers agree.

DET27%to acceptSays no

$18.22Mcap space after

CHI49%to acceptSays no

$3.44Mcap space after

Who says no?

3 votes

Analysis

Detroit is the likelier team to pass: Teravainen is an expiring winger, and the prospect and picks do not clearly replace five seasons of Larkin at center. Chicago could justify paying for Larkin's term, but spending that much during a rebuild makes an October deal unlikely.

Assets

DETReceives-$2,325,833
  • Teuvo Teravainen
    C32$5,400,0001 yr, UFA
    2025-26: 75 GP, 14 G, 21 A, 35 P
  • Sacha Boisvert
    C20$974,1672 yrs, RFA
    2025-26: 7 GP, 1 G, 1 A, 2 P
  • 2027 1st round pick
  • 2027 2nd round pick
CHIReceives+$2,325,833
  • Dylan Larkin
    C30$8,700,0005 yrs, UFA
    2025-26: 74 GP, 34 G, 33 A, 67 P

Why the model says so

Detroit would give up its first-line center without getting a proven replacement or a clearly premium first-round pick.

Larkin would give Chicago a strong center behind Bedard, but Boisvert and two 2027 picks are a steep price for a team projected near the bottom.

The deal

Detroit Red Wings acquire Teuvo Teravainen, Sacha Boisvert, a 2027 1st-round pick (EDM) and a 2027 2nd-round pick (VAN) from the Chicago Blackhawks for Dylan Larkin.

Team by team

DET

Detroit is a bubble team with rebuild signals, so moving Larkin could make sense if it commits to a reset. But he scored 34 goals and 67 points last season and has four more years after this one at $8.7 million; Teravainen scored 35 points, carries a $5.4 million cap hit and becomes a UFA after this season. Boisvert is a 20-year-old center on a $974,167 entry-level deal with one more year after this season, but he has only seven NHL games of experience.

CHI

Chicago would get a proven first-line center to play alongside Bedard, but its projected roster is still years from contention. The 2027 first is Edmonton's slot, not Chicago's; without a projected draft position, its quality is uncertain. Adding that pick, Vancouver's second and Boisvert is a substantial future cost, while Larkin's no-trade clause and Teravainen's modified no-trade clause could complicate the deal.

Discussion

Discord