Calgary upgrades its top-six center position and adds a useful winger at the cost of three good but non-elite forwards; they probably accept despite a modest cap increase because Cozens’ age, production, and term fit a rebuilding core very well.
My Trade Offer
Who says no?
18 votesReaders and the model agree: OTT says no.
Assets
- Cozens, Dylan$7,100,000
- Zetterlund, Fabian$4,275,000
- Farabee, Joel$5,000,000
- Frost, Morgan$4,375,000
- Zary, Connor$3,775,000
Who says no?
Ottawa is giving up the best player and only true top-six center in the deal in Cozens, plus a solid winger, for three middle-six pieces without gaining cap flexibility, picks, or a clear high-ceiling prospect, which runs counter to a bubble team’s need to consolidate around top-end talent.
The deal
Calgary Flames acquire Dylan Cozens and Fabian Zetterlund from the Ottawa Senators in exchange for Joel Farabee, Morgan Frost, and Connor Zary.
Team by team
For Calgary, consolidating Farabee (1 year left at $5M), Frost (UFA after this season at $4.375M with M-NTC), and Zary (1 year left at $3.775M, then RFA) into Cozens (59-point 25-year-old center with three additional years at $7.1M) and Zetterlund (one more year at $4.275M) upgrades their long-term center core with a cost-controlled top-six pivot while slightly increasing cap hit but gaining term and upside at the most valuable position.
For Ottawa, moving Cozens and Zetterlund for Farabee, Frost, and Zary spreads value across three middle-six age-appropriate forwards but sacrifices their best cost-controlled center; with Farabee and Zary under team control beyond this season and Frost as a pending UFA, this looks more like a depth/quantity play than a clear strategic upgrade for a bubble team that should be prioritizing high-end center talent.
Analysis
Value tilts toward Calgary, which lands the best and most premium asset (Cozens) without paying with picks or a clear blue-chip piece, making it unlikely Ottawa would move a 25-year-old 60-point center on a good contract for three non-star forwards. Given Ottawa’s bubble/contending aspirations and need for strong center depth, this structure is not realistic without Ottawa receiving either a higher-end young asset or significant futures attached.
Discussion1
Why would ottawa do this?